Legal Opinion
Dorsen v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0288PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is the plaintiff David M. Dorsen’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E)(ii)(II), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, against the defendant Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). See Pl.’s Mot. for Att’ys Fees (“PL’s Mot.”) at 1, ECF No. 5. The underlying FOIA request sought records which the plaintiff believed were relevant to overturn a substantial civil judgment in favor of the SEC against the plaintiffs client,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Conservation Force v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Reyes v. U.S. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Codrea v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Envtl. Integrity Project v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Schotz v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.