Legal Opinion

Norfolk and Western Ry. Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 10, 1994No. Slip Op. 94-173, No. 92-10-00653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Judge:

Plaintiff is an interstate common carrier by railroad for hire in the United States including Michigan and between the United States and Canada. In connection with its railroad transportation operations, plaintiff owns and operates barges and tugboats used to float plaintiffs railroad cars across the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario to Detroit, Michigan and from Detroit to Windsor. Pl.’s Ex. A at 2. Each barge is fitted with railroad tracks allowing the rail cars to be loaded directly from the slip dock to the barge and vice versa. To conduct its “float operation,”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Telxon Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  2. Marcor Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Norfolk and Western Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Virgin Islands Port Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API