Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 1993No. 4, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari to consider the propriety of the finding by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City that Jerry E. Moore, the petitioner, waived his right to counsel by inaction and whether a criminal trial may proceed in the absence of both the defendant and counsel. 329 Md. 601, 620 A.2d 940. We shall hold that the trial court erred in finding a waiver of counsel by inaction and, so, we shall reverse the petitioner’s conviction and remand the case for a new trial. Consequently, we do not reach the second, and more interesting, issue.

Having been charged with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Crowder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API