Legal Opinion

Lee v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1992No. 2841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment entered in favor of appellees following the denial of appellant’s request for post-trial relief and granting of appellees’ request for delay damages. The issues raised on appeal are: (1) Whether the trial court erred in failing to apportion the damages to reflect the jury’s finding that cigarette smoking was a substantial cause of the appellee’s injuries; (2) Whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s request for a new trial; (3) Whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant remittitur of the jury’s verdict; and (4) Whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Wood v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sweitzer v. Dempster SystemsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Ferber v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Harris v. Shopko Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Harris v. ShopKoUtah Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API