Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Newland
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 4, 2004No. CIV.S-97-2318WBS DAD PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.
On September 13, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Respondents have filed objections to the…
2Cases cited157 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re MarkelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Personal Restraint of MarkelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005