Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Markel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2005No. Nos. 75459-4; 75537-0PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Petitioners Eric and Leadee Markel (Markels) seek reversal of their convictions under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004), resentencing under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), and *265appointment of counsel at public expense. In March 1991, the Markels were each convicted by a jury on four counts of first degree rape of a child of their then five-year-old daughter, Ricki Markel. Ricki was ruled incompetent to testify at trial, and her account of the Markels’ conduct was related to the jury under the child…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. GracianoWashington Supreme Court · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API