Legal Opinion
Gustin v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided September 14, 1967No. Civ. No. A11624PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhyte, J.
This ease comes before us on an agreed statement under rule 126. Prom this statement it appears that plaintiff and appellant Lisa Gustin is a minor who at the age of two *Supp. 931years went to visit a tenant of respondents ’ under an oral lease of an apartment in respondents’ building. While so visiting, Lisa fell through a second floor window which was equipped with a screen which was defective in that it had no locking or latching mechanism, receiving injuries for which she sought damages. The trial court denied recovery finding that defendants owed no duty to plaintiff, a social guest of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chelefou v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Shaw v. ButterworthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Stuart S. Gould v. Jacques DebeveCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Gately v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Dorswitt v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamkin v. TownerIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fakhoury v. MagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Del Pino v. GualtieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980