Chamberlain v. City of St. Ignace
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mackinac. (Pailthorp, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. and judgment entered in favor of defendant. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff sues to recover the amount of the taxes assessed against him upon lands in the city of St. Ignace, in the year 1890, which were paid by him under protest.
There is a special finding which shows that these taxes were levied in the year 1890, and that on the 16th day of February, 1891, the plaintiff paid the tax, delivering a written protest, signed by him; and assigning, among other grounds of protest, one stating that there was no equalization of the valuation of the real estate of said county by the board of supervisors during the year 1890. The record of the- board of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aplin v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ball v. Ridge Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- People Ex Rel. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Shelden v. Township of MarionMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Auditor General v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.