Legal Opinion
Austin v. Nagareddy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 21, 2018No. A18A0126PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Self, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, John Austin appeals from the trial court's order granting Narendra Nagareddy, M.D., and Psychiatry Associates of South Atlanta, P.C.'s (collectively "the defendants") motion to stay his civil action against them until the conclusion of a trial in a criminal case in which Nagareddy had been indicted for parallel allegations. Austin contends that the trial court erred by (1) entering a stay, and (2) applying it to a corporate defendant, which has no constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. For the reasons explained below, we vacate the trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Alcala v. Texas Webb CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- In Re NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Golden Quality Ice Cream Co. v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U-HAUL COMPANY OF ARIZONA Et Al. v. RUTLAND Et Al. and Vice Versa.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Steve Jhun v. Imagine Castle, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021