Schaefer v. Keokuk Savings Bank
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Bartholomew Circuit Court; Hugh Wickens, Judge. Action by the Keokuk Savings Bank against J. George Schaefer. From a.judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.
1. Appellee attacks appellant’s brief as not presenting any question to this.court. Appellant has argued but two questions, first, that certain promissory notes involved were not inland bills of exchange, because not made. payable at a bank in this State. However, in his points and authorities relating to this subject, he has not appli 3d these points to any specific error assigned, but has discussed the subject generally, and under the rules of this court (Rule 22), he has presented nothing for our consideration. Humboldt Fire Ins. Co. v. Ashby (1915), 57 Ind. App. 682, 108 N. E. 150;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. BeboutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Curry v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Bottema v. TracyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Wolf v. AkinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Humboldt Fire Insurance v. AshbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- K. W. Ignition Co. v. Greenville Metal Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917