Legal Opinion

John Shapiro v. Joy Campanelli

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 18, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01859Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN SHAPIRO, Case No. 1:25-cv-01859-JLT-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE 13 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 14 JOY CAMPANELLI, (Doc. 1) 15 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff John Shapiro is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff 18 filed a complaint on December 15, 2025. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the undersigned concludes that 19 the allegations are frivolous and fail to state a claim and recommends dismissing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API