Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Dory

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 23, 2019No. 1084/18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the Matter of Gerald S. Dory No. 1084, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Estates and Trusts > Guardianship > Compensation The statute directs that a guardian of property is compensated as a trustee of a trust. The allowance of a commission is expressly provided for and guided by ET § 13-218(a), which sets forth the compensation and reimbursement of expenses. Estates and Trusts > Trusts > Trustee > Right to Commission Pursuant to ET § 14.5-708, a trustee is entitled to a commission for services in administering a trust with two potential limitations. First, the amount and the source of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Spangler v. McQuittyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. State Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. In re: Trust Under Item TenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Parkway Neuroscience v. Katz, Abosch, etc., PACourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Parkway Neuroscience v. Katz, Abosch, etc., PACourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API