Legal Opinion

Parkway Neuroscience v. Katz, Abosch, etc., PA

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 30, 2022No. 0658/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

Parkway Neuroscience and Spine Institute, LLC v. Katz, Absoch, Windesheim, Gershman & Freedman, P.A., et al., No. 658, September Term, 2021, Opinion by Adkins, J. EVIDENCE-EXPERT TESTIMONY: The admissibility of expert testimony is largely within the discretion of the trial court. Such a ruling, however, may be reversed on appeal if it is founded upon an error of law. Judges making discretionary rulings must apply correct legal standards. EVIDENCE—DAUBERT-ROCHKIND: A trial court, in its gatekeeper role under Rochkind and Daubert, acts improperly in excluding the testimony of a qualified…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API