Legal Opinion

Claim of Pytel v. Carborundum Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award. The employee is mentally incompetent as the result of the injury. Section 115 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law limits the application of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ. [See post, p. 924.]

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Aufiero v. Highwall Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Claim of Kulpa v. Alco Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Claim of Longo v. M & F Auto WreckersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957