Legal Opinion
Oscar Gruss & Son v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1966No. 65 Civ. 33PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves pursuant to Rules 26 and 28 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the issuance of Letters Rogatory to take the depositions of Isidor Buchmann, Willy Kohler and Alex Bloechliger, residents of the Conferation of Switzerland. The parties are in accord that under the laws of Switzerland oral depositions of its residents are not allowed; that depositions may be taken only on written interrogatories under Letters Rogatory forwarded to the appropriate Swiss court through diplomatic channels.1
The plaintiff opposes the application upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Villaneuva Compania Naviera, S.A. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Wynberg v. National Enquirer, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1982
- Kleppinger v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Herbert K. Zassenhaus and Charlotte S. Zassenhaus v. The Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.