Legal Opinion
United States v. Nick Senak
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 29, 1976No. 74--1965PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, Nick Senak, a lawyer, was charged with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 in a five count indictment. The indictment in substance charged Senak with having used his office as pauper attorney of the Lake County, Indiana, Criminal Court, to exact sums of money from a person he had been appointed to represent (Count I) and from relatives and friends of persons he had been appointed to represent (Counts II-V) by stating to such persons that he would not adequately represent the persons he had been appointed to represent unless he were paid amounts in addition to his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cordell Spencer, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.