Legal Opinion

Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 27, 1980No. 79-1423PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

We are called upon to determine whether a letter written by the plaintiff Reginald Carter, a prison inmate, violated the Federal Rules of Evidence when it was read and admitted into evidence at the trial of a § 1983 action brought by Carter against prison authorities. We determine that it did not, and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of the defendants.

I

Reginald Carter is an inmate at the Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon. He claims that he was severely beaten in the course of a routine “shakedown,” or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek OdonerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Aitchison v. RaffianiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. PlasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API