Litwin v. Barrier
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Holmes, J.:
Plaintiff Harry Litwin appeals from a judgment in an action on a promissory note rendered in favor of the defendant John R. Barrier. The facts were submitted to the court by stipulation and are not in dispute.
On or about July 31, 1972, Litwin and Barrier, as comakers, executed a single payment unsecured note in the principal sum of $41,120.00 to Seneca National Bank in Wichita.
On October 30, 1972, the due date, Litwin paid to the bank the sum of $41,847.59, which constituted the full amount of principal and interest due and payable on the note. On the same date, the bank executed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Caldwell v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Mentzer v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Gillham v. TroecklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kee v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Brooks v. SavitchSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989
- Federal Land Bank v. VannCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Wandrey v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Heintz v. WoodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.