Eriksen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is presently before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). Plaintiff has responded to Defendant’s Motion to which Response Defendant has replied. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and supporting documents, and having heard the oral arguments of counsel at the hearing held on February 11,1999, the Court is now prepared issue its decision.
II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE IN ERISA DENIAL OF BENEFITS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dorsey v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Cochran v. Trans-General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Sosinski v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Harris v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Racknor v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.