Legal Opinion

Harris v. Kemper Insurance Companies

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 25, 2005No. 04-40017PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

This is a denial of benefits action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq, (“ERISA”). Plaintiff Fannie Harris is a beneficiary of the Henry Ford Long-Term Disability Plan. Defendant Lumber-mens Mutual Casualty Company, erroneously sued as “Kemper Insurance Companies,” is responsible for paying Plaintiffs claim. Kemper National Services (“KNS”) is the plan’s claims administrator. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s termination of her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Gerald W. Killian and Martha R. Killian, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Carolyn Matkin, Deceased v. Healthsource Provident Administrators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Janice Spangler v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mellian v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. McTaggart v. United Wisconsin InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Flores v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API