Legal Opinion

Sosinski v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 23, 2014No. Case No. 13-13576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Doc. 14) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 15)

AVERN COHN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is a case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff Michael Lee Sosinski (Sosinski) appeals from the final determination of defendant Unum Life Insurance Company (UNUM) that he is not entitled to disability benefits. As *726will be explained, Sosinski applied for and received disability benefits from UNUM as a result of injuries sustained…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulkerson v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. v. CorriganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Martinez v. Holland, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
  4. Zahuranec v. Cigna Heathcare Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API