Seyler v. T-SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The defendants, T-Systems North America, Inc. (“T-Systems”) and Gregg Mihallik, move to compel responses to a subpoena issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. The subpoena sought all correspondence between the plaintiff, Patricia Seyler, and her sister, Julie Seyler. The plaintiff argues that the correspondence is covered by the attorney-client privilege, because her sister is an attorney and the correspondence concerned the seeking and provision of legal advice. The defendants argue that the correspondence was outside the scope…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re Fitch, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, American Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reserve Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- US Airline Pilots Association v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Perella Weinberg Partners LLC v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. HonigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.