Legal Opinion

Foman v. Moss

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1997No. 18A02-9511-CV-669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

The trial court set aside Grace Foman’s (“Foman”) election to take against her deceased husband’s will because she was incompetent. The trial court appointed a guardian and ordered the guardian not to file an election to take against the will. Despite the trial court’s order, the guardian subsequently filed, on Foman’s behalf, an election to take against the will which the trial court struck as invalid. Foman appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 13, 1994, Odell Foman…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bundy v. McKnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boetsma v. BoetsmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Jones v. PeacockSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Estate of Dellinger v. 1st Source BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Estate of Dellinger v. 1st Source BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Eagledale Enterprises, LLC v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API