Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rapistan, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1974No. 757 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

In 1970 the Liquor Control Board (LCB) and Rapistan, Incorporated (Rapistan) entered into a contract whereby Rapistan agreed to construct and install, in the LCB’s Philadelphia warehouse and for the sum of $875,300, a conveyor system capable of handling

25.000 cases of alcoholic beverages during an eight-hour period. Subsequently, the LCB entered into another contract with Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc. (Holt) for the operation of the warehouse. That contract provided for Holt to be paid 13.8^ for each case of alcoholic beverages handled through the warehouse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Burke v. North Huntingdon TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. GelderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Reardon v. WilburSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. In Re Francis Edward McGillick FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Rapistan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API