Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Wilbur

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1971No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Bell,

TMs appeal involves an attempt to join an additional defendant pursuant to Pa. R. C. P. Rule 2252(d). *

Plaintiffs, Susan Reardon, a minor, nine years old at the time of the injury, and lier father, Michael Rear-don, filed a complaint in trespass against defendant, Herman Wilbur. The complaint alleged, inter alia, that Wilbur negligently operated his automobile so as to cause it to collide with and injure the minor plaintiff. Defendant Wilbur filed an amended answer containing new matter joining the minor plaintiffs father, Michael Reardon, as an additional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Sun Ray Drug Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Adams v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Com., Dept. of Public Wel. v. Uec, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Speck v. FinegoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Stein v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API