Legal Opinion
In re Hartman
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided May 4, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In the matter of the petition of Berek Hartman to be admitted as a citizen of the United States. On demurrer to answer of United States.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
The petition for naturalization is in due form, and states all essential facts, which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to be admitted to citizenship. The United States, however, appears by its United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorney, and files an answer to the petition as follows:
“Comes now F. A. O’Connor, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa, and for and on behalf of said United States and at the suggestion of the Chief Naturalization Examiner of the Bureau of Naturalization of the Department of Labor, makes the following…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- In re Pacific Railway CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re VasicekDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1921
- In re KornsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- In Re TaranDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- In re GoldbergDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- In re StasinopulosDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927