United States v. Phillip Harper
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Frank Harper, Phillip Harper, and Bernard Edmond of violating an assortment of 'criminal laws arising from a conspiracy to carjack expensive cars and sell them. Each defendant raises a bevy of challenges to his convictions and sentence. Seeing no merit to any of these challenges, we affirm.
I
The carjacking scheme lasted from late 2010 to early 2011. In a typical case, one of the Harpers would threaten a parking lot valet with a gun while other cohorts would take the keys from a few high-end cars and drive them away. The carjackers delivered the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Austin WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Diaz-RosadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Samuel Mullet, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Javier Trujillo-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. IkegwuonuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.