Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip Harper

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2016No. 14-2426, 14-2427, 14-2428PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Frank Harper, Phillip Harper, and Bernard Edmond of violating an assortment of 'criminal laws arising from a conspiracy to carjack expensive cars and sell them. Each defendant raises a bevy of challenges to his convictions and sentence. Seeing no merit to any of these challenges, we affirm.

I

The carjacking scheme lasted from late 2010 to early 2011. In a typical case, one of the Harpers would threaten a parking lot valet with a gun while other cohorts would take the keys from a few high-end cars and drive them away. The carjackers delivered the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Austin WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Diaz-RosadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Samuel Mullet, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Javier Trujillo-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. IkegwuonuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API