Legal Opinion

United States v. Diaz-Rosado

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 18, 2017No. 15-1010PPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

Luis Yoel Díaz-Rosado (“Díaz”) was convicted of carjacking under 18 U.S.C. § 2119. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the issue of intent, the admission of an alleged confession, the rejection of a proposed supplemental jury instruction, and the admission of an in-court witness identification. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

Although we recite the facts relevant to Diaz’s sufficiency challenge in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we “provide a more or less neutral summary” of the facts relevant to Diaz’s remaining…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Mendoza-MaisonetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Perez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Velazquez-AponteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. Robin O'NeillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. United States v. Rodriguez-SantosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API