Legal Opinion

Lorentzen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 9, 1990No. 2 CA-IC 89-0030PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

In this special action the petitioner contends the Administrative Law Judge (AU) erred in concluding that her exposure to pesticides while on the job resulted in an occupational disease which precluded recovery of compensation. We agree and set aside the award.

Petitioner, a schoolteacher with expertise in the education of gifted students, came to Arizona from Illinois with a history of being especially allergic to pesticides. She accepted work with the respondent employer at its schools in Sells, Arizona, and began teaching gifted students at the respondent employer’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Phoenix Pest Control v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. County of Maricopa v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Kelley v. City of MesaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  3. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. western/cincinnati v. ZerbyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API