Legal Opinion

Miller v. Jenness

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1911No. 17,013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was brought by Carl W. Miller to recover damages resulting from a collision on the public highway between the plaintiff’s horse and buggy and the defendant’s automobile. The plaintiff, with a driver, was going east about eleven o’clock at night, on a well-traveled public highway, about one mile east of Abilene, and the defendant was going in the opposite direction at the time of the collision.

*609The abstract of the defendant shows that the jury returned a general verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and also made findings of fact; that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. City of Kansas v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Himmelwright v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Zinn ex rel. Zinn v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Johnston v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Colwell v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Boyd v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API