Legal Opinion

Wing v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2011No. 25729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In October 2008, plaintiff brought suit for sexual abuse committed more than forty years earlier. He averred that the abuse was perpetrated by a nun and a priest at a boarding school he attended. Defendants moved for summary judgment asserting that the limitations period had expired on plaintiffs claims because he failed to commence his action “within three years of the act alleged to have caused the injury or condition, or three years of the time [he] discovered or reasonably should have discovered that the injury or condition was caused by the act, whichever period…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conway v. ConwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Zephier v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. One Star v. Sisters of St. FrancisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wissink v. Van De StroetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernie v. Blue Cloud AbbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Syrstad v. SyrstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API