Anderson v. Transglobe Energy Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkts.10, 12), and Plaintiffs’ response in opposition (Dkt.19).
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A district court should not dismiss a complaint unless it appears, “beyond doubt that the Plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). To survive a motion to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- In Re Recoton Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Physicians Guardian Unit Investment Trust Ex Rel. Physicians Guardian, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- In Re Eagle Building Technologies, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Cook v. CampbellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.