Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Transglobe Energy Corp.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 8, 1999No. 98-209-CIV-T-17EPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkts.10, 12), and Plaintiffs’ response in opposition (Dkt.19).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

A district court should not dismiss a complaint unless it appears, “beyond doubt that the Plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). To survive a motion to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
  2. In Re Recoton Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Physicians Guardian Unit Investment Trust Ex Rel. Physicians Guardian, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
  4. In Re Eagle Building Technologies, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  5. Cook v. CampbellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API