Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Koch
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1983No. 81 CV 2542 (ERN), 81 CV 1956 (ERN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in No. 81 CV 2542 and the plaintiff in No. 81 CV 1956, as clearly prevailing parties in those actions, have applied for an award of attorneys’ fees, including costs and disbursements, as provided in 42 U.S.C. §§ 19737(e) and 1988. The defendants have taken no position on these applications, although they have filed a memorandum vigorously opposing any award of fees to attorneys representing Gilberto Gerena-Valentin, et al., and/or the Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., which latter organization had been granted permission…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Ross v. SaltmarshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Herron v. KochDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Andrews v. KochDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gerena-Valentin v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Gerena-Valentin v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fink v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Tenney v. BedellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985