Legal Opinion
Parrish v. Seamans
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 25, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-1260PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Bishop P. Parrish, while serving as a member of the United States Air Force, was tried by General Courts-Martial on March 7 through March 25, 1955, and found guilty of the following offenses, which were affirmed by the Air Force Board of Review and the United States Court of Military Appeals: 1
Charge 1, Article 81, Specification 1: As Amended: Did, at Tokyo, Japan, between about 1 Feb 54 and about 28 Feb 54, conspire with Captain Jerry M. Hartz to commit an offense under the UCMJ, to wit: Wrongfully and willfully loan to the said Colonel Bishop P.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Gusik v. SchilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re YamashitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bruner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stephanie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. General Robert E. CUSHMAN, Jr., Commandant, United States Marine Corps, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Cook v. ArentzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Melvin v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Larsen v. HoffmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Local No. 1 v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.