Legal Opinion
Larsen v. Hoffman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-0610, 76-0924PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CORCORAN, District Judge.
I
Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are Reserve officers 1 in the United States Army who were serving on active duty in commissioned status until they were terminated from active duty in late 1975 by reason of two consecutive non-selections (“pass-overs”) for promotion to the next higher temporary grade. Had they not been so terminated, plaintiffs would have completed eighteen years of creditable active duty service and been within two years of becoming eligible for retired pay. Under such circumstances, they would not be subject to…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lewis E. Jones v. Clifford Alexander, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Carl W. Stone, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Paley v. Estate of OgusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Hohri v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.