Sklar v. Ryan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 1990, after careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Peter B. Scuderi, and petitioner’s objections to the Magistrate’s Report, it is hereby Ordered that:
1. The Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation filed is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
3. There is probable cause for appeal.
AND IT -IS SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PETER B. SCUDERI, United States Magistrate.
This is a counseled…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Haywood v. PortuandoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rolling v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Grimes v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.