Legal Opinion

Miller v. O'Bryan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Garland Circuit Court. Hon. J. M. Smith, Circuit Judge. Decree not final, and not subject to appeal, and does not come within sec. 1055 Gantt’s Digest. The merits were not determined. Without consent, or stipulation against it, the mortgage itself gave legal title and right of posession. 1 Hilliard on Mort., ¶. 168, sec. 18. Decree right upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT.

Eakin, J.

On the eleventh of June, 1877, Miller executed to O’Bryan his note for $1,673.40, due the tenth of November, following, with interest from date. To secure this, and supplies to be' advanced, he, at the same time, executed to him a mortgage of all his crop of cotton and corn growing on a certain farm, providing, that in case of default of payment, at the time the note should fall due, of it or any other indebtedness, or should he sell or attempt to sell, ship, remove,, or otherwise dispose of, any of said crop, meanwhile, without the mortgagee’s consent, then, the latter…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Mallett v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Sager v. HibbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Sager v. HibbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API