Legal Opinion

Sager v. Hibbard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1942No. 4-6539PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A permanent record book in the office of the clerk of Arkansas county, at DeWitt, shows that Initiative Act No. 3 was proposed by petition filed September 4, 1940. Its title is: "An Act to prohibit stock from running at large in Arkansas county and to fix the penalty therefor and for the protection of crops and the lives of the people of Arkansas county." The election commissioners certified to having duly canvassed returns from the election held November 5, 1940, and that Arkansas County Act No. 3 received the majority of the votes cast at said election and was duly adopted."

H. P. Hibbard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Ex parte Batesville & Brinkley RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Sanders v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Dobbins Brothers v. Anderson, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Mallett v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Boyd v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Walker v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Palmer v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Ford v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API