Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 30, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Drainage District No. 37 in Mississippi County, Arkansas, was a very large district, created by act No. 3.03 of ihe Acts of 1917, p. 4-85. The plans of the district showed that it would require many drains or ditches to complete the project. Among these was a ditch or drain designated as Improvement No. 48, which hereafter, for convenience, will be so called, which would drain approximately seventy thousand acres of the district.
On the 35th of July, 3920, a contract was entered into by one J. T. Flanagan and District No. 3.7 for the construction of improvement No. 48 as called for by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davie v. DavieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Lewisburg Bank v. SheffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Balch v. . N.Y. and Oswego Midland R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Davis v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Purser v. Corpus Christi State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Parker v. MurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.