Legal Opinion

People v. Hrisoulas

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1967No. Crim. 12815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was charged with four counts of violation of section 288, Penal Code, and two counts of violation of section 288a, Penal Code. The cause was heard by the court sitting without a jury. Defendant was found guilty of committing a lewd and lascivious act upon the body of Stephanie Kresho (§ 288, Pen. Code [count I]) and an act of oral copulation with her (§ 288a, Pen. Code [count II]) ; he was acquitted on the other four counts. Found by the court not to be a mentally disordered sex offender, motion for new trial was denied, proceedings were suspended and defendant was granted five…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Daniel G.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Calcaterra v. BadakhshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. ChildsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. BlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. BlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API