Crawford and Co. v. Vienna
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION.
In this appeal, Crawford and Company, an adjuster, seeks a reversal of the superi- or court’s holding denying it attorneys’ fees as a prevailing party under Civil Rule 82. 1 At issue is whether this court’s holding in Whaley v. Alaska Workers’ Compensation Bd., 648 P.2d 955 (Alaska 1982), is properly extended to this case to limit attorneys’ fees under Civil Rule 82, and whether the superior court abused its discretion. In Whaley we held that attorneys’ fees under Appellate Rule 503(e) will be awarded against employees only if the employees’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Whaley v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Childs v. TulinAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Insurance Co. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.