Legal Opinion

Strong v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1909No. Docket No. 130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Charles W. Strong against the Grand Trunk Western Railway Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. The following is the map referred to in the opinion:

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged negligence of defendant, resulting in a collision of the buggy in which plaintiff was riding with his wife, on the afternoon of August 30, 190'?', with the defendant’s west-bound passenger train at Charlotte, at about 5 o’clock in the afternoon. For a better understanding of the situation, a map which was introduced in evidence showing the surroundings is attached to this opinion. It will be seen that Cochrane avenue is a street 100 feet in width extending north and south and crossing defendant’s tracks. Munson street is 60 feet in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Grostick v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Borschall v. Detroit RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Jensen v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oxenger v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Riley v. WaltersMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Amanta v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Pershing v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Holmes v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API