Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chiate
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
The issue before us is whether the appellant automobile insurer could validly limit its “medical expense” coverage payable to the named insured with respect to injuries to him to that portion of such expense for which the named insured did not receive reimbursement under other forms of medical insurance. We hold that the insurer could so limit its risk.
The plaintiff-appellee, Mac Chiate, is the named insured under an “Economy Automobile’ Policy” issued by the appellant-insurer.- On its first page, the policy provides the following coverage:
“COVERAGE B — MEDICAL EXPENSE: The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- New York Underwriters Insurance v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Caballero v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Salerno v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Wojtkowski v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Wilson v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978