Legal Opinion

Wojtkowski v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 29, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellant, injured, in an automobile accident incurred certain medical expenses for which he sought reimbursement under the “medical pay” provisions of the policy issued to him by appellee. Since appellant had received Medicare payments relative to his expenses, appellee refused to pay him on the basis of the following exclusion contained in its policy:

“This policy does not apply .

Under coverage B — Medical Expenses, to that amount of any medical expense which is paid to or on behalf of the injured person under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sowell v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  5. Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Coconino County v. Fund Administrators Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Hodge v. Middletown Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MacGillivrayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Atkins v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API