Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Deariso

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1950No. 33316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

It does not appear from the plaintiff’s petition that he was a broker, engaged in the business of selling property. On the other hand, it does not appear that he was not such a broker and licensed to sell on a commission basis. The petition is *776not subject to general demurrer in that it was not alleged therein that the plaintiff was a duly licensed broker and agent to sell property for others. It is contended that the petition does not show that a contract existed between the parties on which the plaintiff can recover the sum of $1000. The plaintiff asked the defendant if he wanted to sell his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prior v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Pepsi-Cola Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Weill v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Garfunkel v. ByckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Mosteller v. MashburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arby's, Inc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Christensen v. Roberds of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Wright v. CofieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Arby's, Inc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Carl Wright v. Charles CofieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API