Legal Opinion

Carl Wright v. Charles Cofield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2012No. A12A0080Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOURTH DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., ANDREWS and BOGGS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ July 11, 2012 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A0080. WRIGHT v. COFIELD et al. DO-003 DOYLE , Presiding Judge. This appeal arises from a business dispute between Carl Wright and several Defendants, including Charles Cofield and Russell Neuman. The trial court granted summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Christensen v. Roberds of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Phillips & Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Cary v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. McKenna v. Capital Resource Partners, IV, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API