Legal Opinion

Bernhard Rosee v. The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 1963No. 13857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the amended complaint herein for want of jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Statutes, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343, and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, and the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C.A., §§ 1 to 17.

Appellant, Bernhard Rosee, a trader member of the Chicago Board of Trade, cleared his transactions through the firm of Baggot and Morrison. In June 1960, Rosee and Baggot and Morrison disputed the status of Rosee’s account, and a claim against Rosee for $13,654.41 was received by the Board of Directors. At Rosee’s request,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas Bernstein v. Lind-Waldock & Company and Chicago Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Goodman v. H. Hentz & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  3. Holmes v. Silver Cross Hospital of Joliet, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  4. Karen E. Cardoza v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Parsons College v. North Central Ass'n of Colleges & Secondary SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API