Longhart Supply Co. v. Zweifel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Appellant brought this suit against the ap-pellee to recover a balance of $1,126.46, due upon verified open-account for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant.
■ Appellee answered by general demurrer, general denial and special plea, setting up that on April 18, 1927, the estate of Hofmeier Healy Drilling Company, a partnership, was assigned to defendant in trust for the benefit of the creditors of said company, which assignment was made at the request and behest of said creditors; that the debt sued for was contracted by the trustee in his capacity as such, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Connally v. W. H. Lyons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Bank of Washington v. San Benito & R. G. v. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- J. P. Webster & Sons v. Utopia ConfectioneryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Andrus v. PettusTexas Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keystone Pipe & Supply Co. v. ZweifelTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Nacol v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Texas Candy & Nut Co. v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Beggs v. BrookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Zweifel v. Keystone Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933