Legal Opinion

Beggs v. Brooker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1934No. 13035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant, plaintiff below, judgment in garnishment.

W. H. Slay and U. M. Simon, who are all the partners in the partnership firm of Slay & Simon, attorneys at law, were sued by appellant upon a note executed by them jointly and severally but not in a partnership transaction. At the time of the suit this law firm was attorney for the trustees of an estate attempted to be created by will, in a suit to annul that will brought by the heirs of the testator. The garnishees are those who are the named trustees "in the will. They denied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Wiggins v. BlackshearTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Callaghan v. Estate of GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pendleton v. HareTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gottesman v. ToubinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API