Beggs v. Brooker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant, plaintiff below, judgment in garnishment.
W. H. Slay and U. M. Simon, who are all the partners in the partnership firm of Slay & Simon, attorneys at law, were sued by appellant upon a note executed by them jointly and severally but not in a partnership transaction. At the time of the suit this law firm was attorney for the trustees of an estate attempted to be created by will, in a suit to annul that will brought by the heirs of the testator. The garnishees are those who are the named trustees "in the will. They denied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Wiggins v. BlackshearTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Callaghan v. Estate of GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Pendleton v. HareTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gottesman v. ToubinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962