Zweifel v. Keystone Pipe & Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LATTTMORE, Justice.
Appellee delivered to Hofmeier-Healy Drilling Company oil well casing under terms which .gave it the right to retake same at the time this controversy arose. With the pipe in the hands of the Hofmeier-Healy Company, that company, being insolvent, made an assignment for the benefit of creditors to appellant, who accepted the appointment and in the course of his affairs thereunder wrote this letter to appellee:
“Fort Worth, Tex., April 10, 1932.
“Keystone Pipe & Supply Co.,
“Port Worth, Texas.
“Dear Sir: Att’n Mr. Horwitz.
“With reference to our verbal conversation ■concerning the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connally v. W. H. Lyons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Pierce Fordyce Oil Ass'n v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Austin v. Guaranty State Bank of CopperasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Brooks v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Longhart Supply Co. v. ZweifelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931